Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
Todd Vision (talk | contribs) |
Todd Vision (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
What are the developmental and genetic bases of evolutionary differences in morphology across species? Currently it is difficult to approach this question due to a lack of computational tools that allow researchers to integrate developmental genetic and comparative morphological/anatomical data. | What are the developmental and genetic bases of evolutionary differences in morphology across species? Currently it is difficult to approach this question due to a lack of computational tools that allow researchers to integrate developmental genetic and comparative morphological/anatomical data. | ||
| − | + | We are addressing this by developing a database of evolutionarily variable morphological characters for a large clade of fishes (the Ostariophysi) and connecting this database to the large collection of mutant phenotypes in the [http://zfin.org ZFIN zebrafish database]. The evolutionary and mutant phenotypes are being described using common [[#The_Role_of_Ontologies|common ontologies]]. The database with its web-interface, called EQSYTE (Entity-Quality System for Trait Evolution), together with the extended ontologies and data curation tools, will allow researchers to ask novel questions about the genetic and developmental regulation of evolutionary morphological transitions. Tool and database development are being guided by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_case use cases], or driving research questions, defined by the devo-evo community. These tools are being developed under an open-source, open-development model, and in such a way that they can be used for additional biological systems in the future. | |
| − | |||
| − | Tool and database development | ||
===The Role of Ontologies=== | ===The Role of Ontologies=== | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 4 May 2007
This project arose from a NESCent Working Group led by Paula Mabee and Monte Westerfield, "towards an Intregrated Database for Fish Evolution". Goals and summaries of the group are archived on this wiki.
Contents
Linking Evolution to Genomics Using Phenotype Ontologies
About this project
What are the developmental and genetic bases of evolutionary differences in morphology across species? Currently it is difficult to approach this question due to a lack of computational tools that allow researchers to integrate developmental genetic and comparative morphological/anatomical data.
We are addressing this by developing a database of evolutionarily variable morphological characters for a large clade of fishes (the Ostariophysi) and connecting this database to the large collection of mutant phenotypes in the ZFIN zebrafish database. The evolutionary and mutant phenotypes are being described using common common ontologies. The database with its web-interface, called EQSYTE (Entity-Quality System for Trait Evolution), together with the extended ontologies and data curation tools, will allow researchers to ask novel questions about the genetic and developmental regulation of evolutionary morphological transitions. Tool and database development are being guided by use cases, or driving research questions, defined by the devo-evo community. These tools are being developed under an open-source, open-development model, and in such a way that they can be used for additional biological systems in the future.
The Role of Ontologies
Background
Ontologies are constrained, structured vocabularies with well defined relationships among terms. Ontologies represent a knowledge-base of a particular discipline, and provide not only a mechanism for consistent annotation of data, but also greater interoperability among people and machines. The most widely used biological ontology is the Gene Ontology, which is utilized to annotate molecular function, biological processes and subcellular localization to gene products from different organisms.
Phenotype ontologies
- For model organisms
- Approximately 500 mutant zebrafish lines (alleles) with over 660 annotated phenotypic characters from the jaw or gill arches (n=250), fins (n=210), axial skeleton (n=190) and other features (n=10) of the skeleton have been described. Researchers in the Zebrafish Information Network (ZFIN) are annotating mutant phenotypes using the zebrafish anatomy ontology and the Phenotype And Trait Ontology (PATO). PATO is a “universal” ontology of terms describing qualities (e.g. shape, color, size) that may be applied to any organism.
- For multiple species (for evolutionary biology)
- Representing anatomical character (and character state) data in an ontology-based framework is a new, forward-looking, and integrative move for phylogenetic systematic studies.
Anatomical ontologies
A multi-species ontology for ostariophysan fishes, The Anatomy of Ostariophysi (TAO), will be developed by expanding on the terms in the zebrafish anatomical ontology. To begin with, development of the TAO will concentrate on the skeletal system because it varies significantly across the Ostariophysi, is well-preserved in fossil specimens, and it is often the focus of morphologically-based evolutionary studies in ichthyology. The zebrafish anatomical ontology currently contains 236 skeletal system entities.
The multi-species anatomy ontology for ostariophysan fishes will be used in combination with the PATO ontology (see EQ format) to describe the naturally occurring phenotypes in non-model species (i.e. various ostariophysan fish species).
Taxonomic ontology
We will develop a taxonomic ontology based on the Catalog of Fishes and taxonomic experts in order to relate species with particular characters and states. The taxonomic ontology will include nodes ancestral to the Ostariophysi as far back as the Vertebrata in order to associate certain anatomical terms with more inclusive clades than the Ostariophysi. The taxonomic ontology will be edited using OBO-Edit, similar to the taxonomic ontologies based on NCBI.
As part of this process, we will store statements of homology between entities, so that individual investigators may select particular relationships based on evidence. Thus, for the first time, research questions can be addressed (for example, using the web-interface and query tools that we will build) that require simultaneous data-mining of phylogenetic and genetic data. This approach will also promote integration across morphological systematic studies. Our study, which matches zebrafish model organism genetic data with phylogenetic data from the lineage to which zebrafish belongs (Cypriniformes and ostariophysan relatives), can be generalized to other model organisms and their respective clades. We bring to this study a unique collaboration between evolutionary and model organism biologists that builds upon the strengths of two national centers, a model organism database, a Tree of Life study, a Research Coordination Network, and several community image databases.
Fish Morphology
Although the comparative anatomy of fishes has been documented in the literature for several hundred years, it is not available in a computable format. A Data Curator will input morphological character data that is gleaned from the literature, culled by experts (see table below) and the ichthyological community. The model of a “curated” database is one that has proven effective for model organism databases such as zebrafish, Drosophila, and mouse. EQSYTE (Entity-Quality System for Trait Evolution) will consist of a database and user interface in which the ontologies and data for evolutionary phenotypes are integrated with the zebrafish mutant phenotypes and associated genetic data from ZFIN.
Our goal is to input approximately 4,000 morphological features in an “EQ” format (Mabee et al. 2007a) using a combination of ontologies.
| Year | Taxon | PI | # Papers | # Characters | # Taxa | # Species, Genera, Families |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cypriniformes | Mayden | 72 | 1125* | 1000 | 3268, 321, 5 |
| 1 | Siluriformes | Lundberg | 150 | 1200** | 1000 | 2867, 446, 35 |
| 2 | Characiformes | Coburn | 81 | 800 | 550 | 1674, 270, 18 |
| 2 | Gymnotiformes | Arratia | 20 | 200 | 50 | 134, 30, 5 |
| 3 | Gonorhynchiformes | Arratia | 40 | 75 | 20 | 37, 7, 4 |
| 3 | Clupeiformes | Hilton | 60 | 380 | 125 | 364, 84, 5 |
| TOTAL | 423 | 37802 | 2745 | 8344, 1158, 72 |
* includes original characters from CToL
** All Catfish project (J. Lundberg)
Help needed
We are hiring two research programmers. See the NESCent employment page for more details.
Contact
Paula Mabee (University of South Dakota) is the Principal Investigator. Co-principal investigators are Todd Vision (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill), Monte Westerfield (University of Oregon, ZFIN), and Hilmar Lapp (NESCent) (see their contact addresses).
