EQ Editor

From phenoscape
Revision as of 17:11, 18 April 2007 by Hilmar (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

EQ Editor requirements

These requirements are a first stab taken at the PI meeting at NESCent on Feb 26-27, 2007.

Morphologist Workflow

  1. One reference publication, many species, several characters
    • Have reference publication about taxonomic group, with figures, for skeletal characters
    • May proceed section by section; need to specify section, or figure, or generally part of a reference
    • Need to denote species, choose anatomical entity, choose quality, such as anterior margin, specify value
    • May have questions, or need to input free text comments, e.g., about uncertainties
  2. Single species, single publication, multiple characters
    • Might also have a paper describing a single species
    • Curator would use a specimen to confirm accuracy of annotation
  3. Many species, many publications, single character
    • May also use a character survey
    • Would use many different papers
    • Would span many different species
  4. Specimen may be a fossil record
    • Need to record geological time
    • Will do that later
  5. Specimen-based annotation is not part of the project
  • Need to reference "traditional" character: should be able to verbatim quote original character description, also give publication reference; there are often differing, even conflicting, definitions for the same character
  • Need to be able to see what is already present about a particular character; may also need to look at "similar" characters (as defined by, e.g., characters using sibling terms and sibling qualities)
  • Need to see the values that have been assigned already for a character
  • There may be conflicting character states reported in different publications; the data curator will decide whether these conflicts need to be kept or can be reconciled.
  • Verification of characters descriptions and state values by Data Curator or even Morphologist, e.g., using actual specimen(s), and attributing the verification
  • Want all annotations to be associated with voucher specimens (may only be a photograph though)

UI requirements

For example, the Fink & Fink paper

  • start by setting the reference we will be working with
  • define a set of species we are going to work on
  • select skeletal region as a focus, e.g. the gill arch region, or tail fin
  • look at what has already been annotated for this region, as a character-by-taxon matrix
    • expect several hundred taxa, and between 50 and 200 characters, depending on how feature-rich the region is
    • a source paper may not give the character at the species level, so the taxon may be a higher-level taxon
  • if characters are already present, just add the reference
  • otherwise define new character
    • choose existing entity term, initially this will be an anatomy term; term may not exist yet in which case we need to work with a provisional term
    • choose attribute term from PATO; term may not exist yet in which case we need to work with a provisional term
    • denote original character description, with reference (which will probably be the paper we are working with)
  • edit/view character: will see the images that have been used for the different states (values) that have been assigned
  • assign/edit character states using a table with only the set of species chosen earlier, and one or more characters that correspond to the original character definition
    • denote original character state description, with reference (which will probably be the paper we are working with)
  • Taxonomic naming challenges: need to map original names to current classification; should never have two distinct rows for what is currently considered (as defined by the taxonomic ontology) the same species

Database requirements

  • Need to have references to digital information, such as specimen record and image