Edit this page on GitHub

Phenotype Ontology Coordination Workshop

**Phenotype Ontology Coordination Workshop: April 27-28, 2009** A workshop hosted by the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent)

Location and Date

Venue: National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent) (directions, also see information for visitors)

Date: April 27-28, 2009

Organizers: Paula Mabee, Monte Westerfield, Todd Vision

Introduction

The goal of this workshop is to discuss plans for an RCN (Research Coordination Network) or INTEROP (Community-based Data Interoperability Networks) application to NSF that we would submit in July or August 2009. The grant would provide funds for 3-5 years of meetings and workshops (and in the case of the INTEROP program, implementation to a limited extent) to identify problems and develop methods and plans to describe phenotypes in a much broader range of species.

Specific goals are to be determined by the workshop participants. An initial list includes establishing and maintaining communication among evolutionary biologists and model organism communities developing ontologies, coordinating efforts among the broader ontology community so that these ontologies are interoperable, and methods to align and reason across multi-species ontologies for phenotype and taxonomy. The workshop includes interested members from both the model organism and evolutionary biology communities.

Agenda

Monday, Apr. 27, 2009

Taking stock: Where do we stand? What resources and needs do we have in common? Identify broader community needs for a [Comparative Evolutionary] Phenotype Consortium that are not currently served by individual grants.

Morning: What new ontologies are required? How do existing common ontologies need to be extended?

Afternoon: Annotation and Interoperability

Tuesday, Apr. 27, 2009

Morning: Databases and Trees;

Logistics

Reading

Final report

1. What are the key gaps in tools to develop your work? 2. What are key obstacles to data exchange and data integration? 3. What do you perceive as the key ontologies that are lacking? 4. What are the gaps in expertise in understanding, developing and applying ontologies in the community?

Participants

Members of Phenoscape are in bold font.

| Name | Institution | |——|——————————–|