Difference between revisions of "Anatomy Tree Display"
(→Version 4) |
(→page 4) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Image:singlewindow1.png|700px]] | [[Image:singlewindow1.png|700px]] | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
| + | * We should display all relationship types in the tree view, not just ''is_a''. | ||
===page 2=== | ===page 2=== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
[[Image:singlewindow4.png|700px]] | [[Image:singlewindow4.png|700px]] | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
| + | * Since the search produces a list of mixed types of terms, should be an indicator of what the term is - entity, quality, gene, taxon, etc. | ||
== Version 3 == | == Version 3 == | ||
Latest revision as of 16:24, 1 February 2010
Version 4
This revision puts the ontology tree on the left as the primary browsing tool. Data for the selected term appears in the tabbed panels to the right.
page 1
Comments
- We should display all relationship types in the tree view, not just is_a.
page 2
Comments
page 3
Comments
page 4
Comments
- Since the search produces a list of mixed types of terms, should be an indicator of what the term is - entity, quality, gene, taxon, etc.
Version 3
For conference call on 1/26/10. Notes and features on screenshots based on 1/22/10 conference call.
Two panel display of summary results
page 1
page 2
Version 2
For conference call on 1/22/10
Access anatomy tree summary results from front search page:
Summary results, page 1
Summary results, page 2
Two panel display of summary results
Version 1
From conference call on 1/21/2010"
Access anatomy tree summary results from front search page:
Summary results, page 1
Comments:
- Alternatively, this could be a two-panel display with tree in the left panel and results table in right panel, similar to BioPortal's layout.
- make mockup for next conf call
- How to clearly indicate relationships on branches? For example, "type of" and "part of" with arrow pointing to parent?
- Don't need to display relationships on branches if tree has "subtype results" and "subpart results" labeled.
- tree is confusing. Would be clearer to indent child terms, similar to OBO-edit's ontology tree viewer.
Summary results, page 2
Version 0
Search summary results
Copied from this page: Knowledgebase_mockups
This would be an enhancement to the Phenotypes results currently displayed on a page like http://kb.phenoscape.org/search/anatomy/TAO:0000376
The leftmost column is intended to represent a disclosable tree display. The nearest common ancestor of the represented annotated anatomy terms is used as the root of the tree display. Each anatomy term has a flat list of the qualities annotated for it. Don't pay too much attention to the dummy numbers given in these results.
Root anatomy term "infraorbital" collapsed:
Root anatomy term "infraorbital" expanded:
Possible further enhancement to page capabilities - redisplay data on a quality tree. The included results would be somewhat different.
Nearest quality ancestor collapsed:
Quality ancestor expanded:
Comments
- From Paula: Rename 'Entity' 'Anatomy' as per other mockups for consistency http://kb.phenoscape.org/search/anatomy/TAO:0000376
- From Paula: swap column headings Entity-Quality on Quality tree table (below ' Nearest quality ancestor collapsed" text)
- From Todd (cosmetic): I'm not sure the alternating colors will be clear when there are multiple rows - those are most useful as an aid to follow horizontally across many columns within a row
- From Todd: would it be possible to collapse the quality column too (ie to "4 qualities" for a given entity? or "4 anatomical terms" for a given quality)?
- From Todd: Personally I think having the anatomical entity in the 1st column is a lot more useful than having the quality tree there.
