Difference between revisions of "Entities with taxonomic context"
(→Phenotype annotations) |
(→Phenotype annotations) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
vertebra 1^''in_taxon''(Danio rerio) ''is_a'' vertebra 1^''in_taxon''(Cyprinidae) | vertebra 1^''in_taxon''(Danio rerio) ''is_a'' vertebra 1^''in_taxon''(Cyprinidae) | ||
vertebra 1^''in_taxon''(Danio rerio) ''is_a'' bone | vertebra 1^''in_taxon''(Danio rerio) ''is_a'' bone | ||
− | |||
− | |||
==Taxonomically variable ontology relationships== | ==Taxonomically variable ontology relationships== | ||
==Homology annotations== | ==Homology annotations== |
Revision as of 02:52, 4 March 2009
Our phenotype annotations currently employ linking a phenotype composition to a taxon via an exhibits relation. However this model has not provided an obvious way to employ taxon-specific homology annotations to the anatomical entities being annotated. This page describes an alternative representation of phenotype annotations which seems to provide a solution for employing homology annotations as well as anatomical relations which are taxon-specific.
Phenotype annotations
Our current phenotype annotation model has the form "a particular taxon has some phenotype, consisting of some quality inhering in some anatomical entity":
Danio rerio exhibits sigmoid^inheres_in(vertebra 1)
The phenotype is a post-composition with the following properties:
sigmoid^inheres_in(vertebra 1) is_a sigmoid sigmoid^inheres_in(vertebra 1) inheres_in vertebra 1
This annotation can be stated differently as "some anatomical entity, in a particular taxon, has some quality":
vertebra 1^in_taxon(Danio rerio) has_quality sigmoid
The entity is a post-composition with the following properties:
vertebra 1^in_taxon(Danio rerio) is_a vertebra 1 vertebra 1^in_taxon(Danio rerio) in_taxon Danio rerio
Taking into account the contents of the TAO and TTO ontologies, we can infer useful statements such as:
vertebra 1^in_taxon(Danio rerio) is_a vertebra 1^in_taxon(Cyprinidae) vertebra 1^in_taxon(Danio rerio) is_a bone