Difference between revisions of "Knowledgebase/Ideas for the future"
From phenoscape
(New page: # Commenting feature (from Sandrine's beta testing sheet) The database gives a better direct access to huge amounts of data, it has to enable communication among scientists in more precise...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
# Commenting feature (from Sandrine's beta testing sheet) | # Commenting feature (from Sandrine's beta testing sheet) | ||
The database gives a better direct access to huge amounts of data, it has to enable communication among scientists in more precise and more dynamic ways too. Thus it is very important to allow users to add comments (on a single litigious character or observation for example). So how could users add comments on the registered data? How could they discuss, make decisions on statements? Would it be feasible with the present structure of the database? | The database gives a better direct access to huge amounts of data, it has to enable communication among scientists in more precise and more dynamic ways too. Thus it is very important to allow users to add comments (on a single litigious character or observation for example). So how could users add comments on the registered data? How could they discuss, make decisions on statements? Would it be feasible with the present structure of the database? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Informatics]] | ||
| + | [[Category:User Interface]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Community]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:21, 2 December 2009
- Commenting feature (from Sandrine's beta testing sheet)
The database gives a better direct access to huge amounts of data, it has to enable communication among scientists in more precise and more dynamic ways too. Thus it is very important to allow users to add comments (on a single litigious character or observation for example). So how could users add comments on the registered data? How could they discuss, make decisions on statements? Would it be feasible with the present structure of the database?
