BBOP OBD visit

From phenoscape
Revision as of 02:47, 25 August 2008 by Jpb15 (talk | contribs) (→‎OBD SQL)

These are notes from Jim's and Cartik's visit to BBOP. Also of interest are Chris Mungall's original notes for a work plan for the week.

Notes

OBD model

  • Began mapping of Phenex data model to OBD model. This is currently implemented in org.phenoscape.bridge.OBDModelBridge.java, in the Phenex source.
    • "Administrative" entities such as the character matrix, characters, and states, are modeled as instances of types from CDAO. This is currently done in a placeholder manner, e.g. "cdao:CharacterStateDataMatrix".
    • The mapper gives some of these entities generated IDs, which makes them easier to work with in OBD (avoiding blank nodes). These IDs are being generated because it doesn't seem prudent to rely on the given ID in the NeXML file/Phenex, as that is more of a local, in-file identifier. However, this presents complications for adding or modifying data for a data set already in OBD.
    • Need to interact with EvoInfo group to confirm correct usage of types and relations from CDAO.
    • Mapping of specimens is still to be implemented.
  • Phenotypes
    • Quantities such as measurement are not yet handled. This will require further discussion between Cartik, Chris, and Jim. Beyond basic quantities, we want to also handle min and max, as defined in PhenoXML.
    • We may want to remove the count field from Phenex and input counts as measurements instead. The "count" unit is available in the units ontology. This is up for discussion at the moment.
    • The relation of a taxon to a phenotype is currently called "exhibits". The default semantics do not automatically map a phenotype to supertypes in the taxonomy ontology. However, such inferences could be desirable.
    • Could find "some particular genus" exhibits "all the phenotypes of its member species"
    • Need to decide if we want that to come from reasoner and then provide needed semantics to relation
    • This behavior would be consistent with how this relation is understood for a particular species (i.e. not all individuals must exhibit phenotype).
  • Status of phylogeny data is still undecided and unimplemented. Could leave as an opaque piece of data and deal with only in application. Other extreme is to completely represent phylogeny via OBD links. Middle path could leave opaque but at least create relations to TTO taxa referenced within.

OBD SQL

  • Source: https://obo.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/obo/obo-database/trunk
  • Instantiating the OBD database is easiest via running of scripts in the scripts directory in the OBDAPI project.
    • Run obd-create-db.pl -h <HOST> -d obdevo -c obdevo.conf
    • Then run obd-reasoner.pl -d obdevo@HOST
    • This populates the deductive closure
    • "obdevo.conf" would just be a newline separated list of ontology IDs (teleost_anatomy, quality etc) or URLs
  • These scripts are currently not written to accept arbitrary DB usernames and passwords, but work well for a DB on localhost with no password.
  • The scripts are critical for easy importing of all needed ontologies.
  • Workaround - created a local OBD instance on laptop, then dumped and imported into darwin.nescent.org.
  • Importing dump into darwin.nescent.org is complicated by its attempt to create a plpgsql language, which can only be done by a DB superuser.
  • Workaround - have superuser create language for a blank DB. Copy it as a template for future use ("emptydbplpgsql"). Comment out language creation in dump SQL. Import dump into darwin DB.
  • We need to work with Chris and Rob on script workflow and handling of stricter DB security situations.

OBD API

  • Source: https://obo.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/obo/OBDAPI/trunk
  • We used the OBD Java API to implement the mapping in Phenex (above), including data loader from Phenex into OBD.
  • We successfully connected to and manipulated a local OBD database as well as an OBD instance at darwin.nescent.org via the OBD API.
  • Queries to the API can be performed directly from the Restlet application. However, it would make sense to develop convenience APIs above OBDAPI for our application data model (reduce tedious traversals performed by view code).
  • Cartik has implemented sample queries using the OBD API (these are on his machine and may not have been committed anywhere yet).

OBD Web UI

  • Source https://geneontology.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/geneontology/OBDUI
  • BBOP instance: http://spade.lbl.gov:8080/OBDUI
  • OBDUI project is quite easy to build and package into a WAR from Eclipse. Automated server builds via Ant are not yet implemented. Ant builds and automated deployment would be desirable from a NESCent perspective.
  • It is also quite simple to run the OBDUI application directly from Eclipse via a local copy of Tomcat.
  • Some of the URLs in the application including certain OBO identifiers require the following options enabled in Tomcat:
    • -Dorg.apache.tomcat.util.buf.UDecoder.ALLOW_ENCODED_SLASH=true
    • -Dorg.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.ALLOW_BACKSLASH=true
  • Additional databases can be made available in the application by adding to the configuration in WebContent/obdRestServletConfig.xml.
  • The Phenoscape web UI can be begun by implementing Phenoscape-specific Resources within the existing OBDUI project. The OBDUI application provides a useful infrastructure (such as important superclasses like org.obd.ws.coreResource.OBDResource.java), and the Phenoscape data source can easily be added in its own URL-space separate from other data sources loaded in the application.
  • Longer term it may be wise to sort out better ways to develop a completely independent application which reuses functionality from the core OBDUI code.

Phenex OBD interaction, OBD data loading

  • Source: https://obo.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/obo/phenote/trunk
  • Loading of data from Phenex into OBD is implemented in org.phenoscape.bridge.OBDModelBridgeTest.java, as a JUnit test.
  • Ideally the reasoner needs to be run after ontology and data loading, to precompute relations.
  • For this reason a "data warehousing" approach may be the best plan for using the current code.
    • Annotated data could be deposited into a public directory (possibly SVN), and a script could periodically clear and repopulate the database, by importing those files, then run the reasoner.
    • This approach also avoids issues still under consideration regarding unique IDs for particular datasets and how to import modifications to datasets already in ODB.
    • This would also keep ontology content up-to-date. The reasoner cannot currently remove previously precomputed links that an updated ontology version no longer implies.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.phenoscape.org/wg/phenoscape/index.php?title=BBOP_OBD_visit&oldid=3752"