EQ Editor
From phenoscape
Contents
EQ Editor requirements
These requirements are a first stab taken at the PI meeting at NESCent on Feb 26-27, 2007.
Morphologist Workflow
- One reference publication, many species, several characters
- Have reference publication about taxonomic group, with figures, for skeletal characters
- May proceed section by section; need to specify section, or figure, or generally part of a reference
- Need to denote species, choose anatomical entity, choose quality, such as anterior margin, specify value
- May have questions, or need to input free text comments, e.g., about uncertainties
- Single species, single publication, multiple characters
- Might also have a paper describing a single species
- Curator would use a specimen to confirm accuracy of annotation
- Many species, many publications, single character
- May also use a character survey
- Would use many different papers
- Would span many different species
- Specimen may be a fossil record
- Need to record geological time
- Will do that later
- Specimen-based annotation is not part of the project
- Need to reference "traditional" character: should be able to verbatim quote original character description, also give publication reference; there are often differing, even conflicting, definitions for the same character
- Need to be able to see what is already present about a particular character; may also need to look at "similar" characters (as defined by, e.g., characters using sibling terms and sibling qualities)
- Need to see the values that have been assigned already for a character
- There may be conflicting character states reported in different publications; the data curator will decide whether these conflicts need to be kept or can be reconciled.
- Verification of characters descriptions and state values by Data Curator or even Morphologist, e.g., using actual specimen(s), and attributing the verification
- Want all annotations to be associated with voucher specimens (may only be a photograph though)
UI requirements
For example, the Fink & Fink paper
- start by setting the reference we will be working with
- define a set of species we are going to work on
- select skeletal region as a focus, e.g. the gill arch region, or tail fin
- look at what has already been annotated for this region, as a character-by-taxon matrix
- expect several hundred taxa, and between 50 and 200 characters, depending on how feature-rich the region is
- a source paper may not give the character at the species level, so the taxon may be a higher-level taxon
- if characters are already present, just add the reference
- otherwise define new character
- choose existing entity term, initially this will be an anatomy term; term may not exist yet in which case we need to work with a provisional term
- choose attribute term from PATO; term may not exist yet in which case we need to work with a provisional term
- denote original character description, with reference (which will probably be the paper we are working with)
- edit/view character: will see the images that have been used for the different states (values) that have been assigned
- assign/edit character states using a table with only the set of species chosen earlier, and one or more characters that correspond to the original character definition
- denote original character state description, with reference (which will probably be the paper we are working with)
- Taxonomic naming challenges: need to map original names to current classification; should never have two distinct rows for what is currently considered (as defined by the taxonomic ontology) the same species
Database requirements
- Need to have references to digital information, such as specimen record and image