Change And Correlation

Version 1

Slide 1: Intro page

Slide 2: January Tree Display

Slide 3: Current Tree Co-occurance Display

Slide 4: A Phenotype by Taxon matrix we could have had

Slide 5: A tree with negative data and a detected change

Slide 6: A Phenotype by Taxon matrix with negative annotations

Slide 7: Change and Correlation diagrams and overview

Slide 8: Change Detection using incompatible qualities

Slide 9: Change Detection between individuals, using gene-tree species-tree

Slide 10: Disjoint_with and incompatible qualities

Slide 11: Changing PATO

=== Slide 12: Patching Process Flow ---

Slide 13: PATO breakdown by attribute

Slide 14: Incompatibility and Relational Qualities

Slide 15: Transition to Correlation

Slide 16: Correlation and Contingency Tables

Slide 17: Reasoning only takes us so far

Notes from March 30, 2010 meeting

Peter presented the preceding slides. There was some discussion of the definition of disjoint, as mentioned on slide 5. OBO's definition refers to classes with no common members (as does OWL's). Paula pointed out that entities related by develops_from may exhibit incompatible qualities. This might be a general problem related to temporal reasoning (entities changing qualities over time).

Todd questioned the need for optimization for the use case of placing a phenotype change on a tree, citing the example of identifying where on a tree a change corresponding to a phenotype of a zebrafish gene mutation. Peter did not have an immediate answer for this.

Todd mentioned liking the current Phenotype Profile interface (taxon tree on slide 3). Todd asked how these related to the